Fucking psychosis of yammering... Talk talk talk while the 130 Jewish First billionaires and several million Jewish millionaires suck the blood from the world in real kinetic time.
Tehran is out of drinking water and we have this fucking dog and pony show?
The "slippery slope" argument around defining hate speech suggests that if we define and ban any speech as "hate speech," it will inevitably lead to censoring other, more protected forms of expression. Proponents of this view argue that it is difficult to draw a clear line, and any attempt to do so will be used by authorities to expand power and curb free speech in the future, potentially by including progressively broader categories of content. Critics, however, say this is a fallacy that shuts down debate and that it's possible to define and regulate specific types of hate speech, such as direct incitement or true threats.
Arguments for the slippery slope concern
Expansion of government power:
Creating a new category for "hate speech" could give governments more authority to punish and restrict speech they disagree with, even if it doesn't meet the criteria for existing exceptions like incitement or true threats.
Chilling effect on speech: Fear of crossing the line can lead to self-censorship, where people avoid expressing controversial opinions to avoid being penalized.
Difficulty in defining boundaries:
Some argue that defining "hate speech" is subjective and can be used to ban a wide range of content, from explicit slurs to subtle expressions.
Examples of expanding definitions: Some policies may start by targeting hate speech based on race and gender and gradually expand to include other categories like religion, age, or other characteristics.
Restricted from what? I have been censored in my town. About to give a talk on media and press literacy, but the talk was cancelled. Something about hate speech in one of my articles... No reason in writing. Is that what you're referencing?
Fucking psychosis of yammering... Talk talk talk while the 130 Jewish First billionaires and several million Jewish millionaires suck the blood from the world in real kinetic time.
Tehran is out of drinking water and we have this fucking dog and pony show?
u got restricted?
The "slippery slope" argument around defining hate speech suggests that if we define and ban any speech as "hate speech," it will inevitably lead to censoring other, more protected forms of expression. Proponents of this view argue that it is difficult to draw a clear line, and any attempt to do so will be used by authorities to expand power and curb free speech in the future, potentially by including progressively broader categories of content. Critics, however, say this is a fallacy that shuts down debate and that it's possible to define and regulate specific types of hate speech, such as direct incitement or true threats.
Arguments for the slippery slope concern
Expansion of government power:
Creating a new category for "hate speech" could give governments more authority to punish and restrict speech they disagree with, even if it doesn't meet the criteria for existing exceptions like incitement or true threats.
Chilling effect on speech: Fear of crossing the line can lead to self-censorship, where people avoid expressing controversial opinions to avoid being penalized.
Difficulty in defining boundaries:
Some argue that defining "hate speech" is subjective and can be used to ban a wide range of content, from explicit slurs to subtle expressions.
Examples of expanding definitions: Some policies may start by targeting hate speech based on race and gender and gradually expand to include other categories like religion, age, or other characteristics.
Restricted from what? I have been censored in my town. About to give a talk on media and press literacy, but the talk was cancelled. Something about hate speech in one of my articles... No reason in writing. Is that what you're referencing?
no, i mean ur comment, i can't read that...oh it seems i am the one who got the restrictions, i cant read ur comment above.