Yemen Scholars Back Iran, Call for Resistance and Unity Against the US and Zionists
Yemen’s top religious body backs Iran against US, Zionist, and Western pressure, urging Islamic unity, open positions, and readiness to confront aggression.
Yemen, PUREWILAYAH.COM - The Yemen Scholars Association announced its full support and solidarity with the Islamic Republic of Iran in confronting the American, Zionist, and Western pressures and threats it is facing, affirming that what is taking place falls within the broader targeting of the Islamic Ummah and its independence-seeking projects.
In a statement, the Association called on the scholars of the Islamic Ummah to declare a clear, fraternal, and Islamic stance in support of Iran. It stressed that the current stage requires explicit and responsible positions.
It emphasized that such positions must be far removed from silence or neutrality. This call comes amid escalating challenges and conspiracies targeting the forces of resistance and rejection in the region.
Readiness, Mobilization, and Islamic Unity Against Aggression
The Yemen Scholars Association urged its brothers in the Islamic Republic to remain steadfast and resilient. It called on them not to make any concessions to any of the demands of the United States, the Zionist entity, or the West.
It affirmed that these parties seek nothing but to subjugate the Ummah and undermine its sovereignty and independent decision-making.
The statement stressed the necessity of demonstrating the principle of loyalty to the believers. It called for directing the compass of enmity clearly toward the enemies of the Ummah.
At the forefront of these enemies, it said, are the United States and the Zionist enemy. It warned against attempts to blur positions or dilute the real conflict facing the region.
The Association also called on the Islamic Ummah—its regimes, peoples, and armies—to emerge from the disgraceful state of silence and neutrality.
This call concerns what the Ummah in general, and the Islamic Republic of Iran in particular, is facing.
It emphasized that continued silence encourages the forces of arrogance to persist in their aggression and expansionist policies.
The statement further emphasized the need to raise the level of preparedness and readiness. It called for general mobilization within the framework of religious responsibility. It urged responsiveness to the Qur’anic call to confront tyranny and defend the Ummah, stressed that unity of the Islamic position constitutes the true safeguard against projects of domination and aggression. (PW)
Wonderful that we back Iran against the US/ZIM/130 Jewish Billionaires and millions of Jewish Millionaires, but . . .
Iran is going , going, almost gone, gone, gone and now an add-on for the Jews' New Levant.
The Kremlin Editorial for Iran is Surrender or Die
ran will be able to do little against Israeli and American aircraft – modern air defence systems are almost useless against US and Israeli strike aircraft. Iran may be able to use fighters, but only where they can hide in the folds of the terrain when flying to the area of combat operation. In small quantities, with a low chance of success and the highest risk of loss. And even if Iran shoots down a number of enemy aircraft, it will not affect the course of hostilities.
And, of course, one should not take into account fantasies about how Iranian drones or submarines will hit an American aircraft carrier – such antics against the US Navy are useless and will lead to nothing but losses. The Iranians fought the Americans at sea in 1988 and were butchered by ridiculously small American forces. Iranian ships should stay away from US ships.
Iran’s weakness is also the quality of its force management – all decisions are made and agreed upon in advance, and the security forces themselves are prone to simple and predictable actions. Iran can only dream of a western approach to military management, when any problem that suddenly arises is not hidden, but immediately voiced and begins to be solved. All this, however, does not mean that Iran has absolutely nothing to put on the table.
The Islamic Republic’s first strong point is its missile arsenal.
No matter how effective American ships are as a means of air defence, you can either overwhelm them with a swarm of missiles, or take other measures to make missile defence difficult. In addition to ballistic missiles, Iran also has a number of cruise missiles.
The second advantage is motivated personnel willing to sacrifice themselves. They will be able to recruit volunteers for dangerous missions, and for suicidal ones too, mainly through the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Iran has an army organized and trained not like the religious soldiers from the IRGC, but according to western methods. And this army has well-trained special forces, including combat swimmers, who can be used to sabotage enemy targets.
Iran has land-based anti-ship missile installations. Finally, Iran still has a number of “proxies” in Iraq. And there is a land connection with them across the Iranian border. These resources immediately hint at what the response might be.
The first is massive missile strikes on American bases. Iran openly declares its readiness for them. To do this, Iran needs to get as many missiles out of harm’s way in advance, disperse them and disguise them so that they cannot be destroyed by multiple air strikes. Then attack all available American bases, using missiles in such quantities that the Americans will not be able to shoot them down.
Secondly, the attacks of the Shaheds must be synchronized with missile strikes. The opponent must be faced with the choice of which strike to tackle.
The third is sabotage on enemy territory, in neighbouring countries. They may be small in scale, but they will force the enemy to strain and waste energy on countering.
Fourth, Iran should start laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz, blocking oil supplies to the world market and inflating prices. This will make the American operation extremely toxic for all oil consumers in the world and create serious pressure on the United States. Despite the fact that the collapse of the global energy market may even be beneficial to American [oil producers], but politically the [Trump Administration] may not be able to withstand the pressure of oil consumers. Iran has hundreds of small high-speed boats as part of the IRGC naval forces, their crews are trained to lay sea mines, and Iran has a lot of these mines.
The mining will cost Iran dearly in terms of casualties. But here, personnel motivated to self-sacrifice will speak out—no matter how many mine-laden motorboats sink, more must return to sea.
A mine war will require the United States to take mine clearance measures. The Iranians will be able to attack the forces that will carry this out, drawing the US into battles on their own terms and forcing ships to go where Iran can use anti-ship missiles from the shore. If the strait is blocked, Iranian mini-submarines will be able to cross the Persian Gulf, ensuring the actions of saboteurs and also covertly laying mines.
It might even be possible to launch a drone carrier disguised as a merchant ship, complete with a special forces unit, and test the strength of the Diego Garcia base once military action begins. Here again, personnel prepared to sacrifice themselves could prove useful.
https://libya360.wordpress.com/2026/01/30/the-kremlin-editorial-for-iran-is-surrender-or-die/