Lebanon / Occupied Palestine, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Hebrew-language media outlets have acknowledged growing alarm within the Zionist regime over the expanding capabilities of Hezbollah, particularly in drone warfare, alongside a worsening strategic deadlock in southern Lebanon.

Hezbollah Drone Capabilities Raise Alarm in Tel Aviv

According to the Hebrew newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth, Tel Aviv is increasingly concerned about the potential use of Hezbollah’s specialized suicide drones by Palestinian groups in the West Bank and Gaza.

The report described these fiber-optic-guided drones as one of the most dangerous threats facing Zionist forces in southern Lebanon, emphasizing that there is currently no effective defense system capable of countering them.

It noted that these drones are difficult to detect, have a range of up to 15 kilometers, and cannot be disrupted through conventional electronic warfare systems, as they do not rely on radio signals.

The report added that Hezbollah’s drone strikes have already wounded dozens of Zionist soldiers within a short period, highlighting their growing impact on the battlefield.

Israeli Officials Admit “Strategic Trap” in Lebanon

In a separate report, the Hebrew newspaper Israel Hayom cited a senior Zionist security official admitting that the regime is now trapped in a strategic deadlock in Lebanon.

“We are caught in a strategic trap,” the official said. “On one hand, we cannot withdraw from southern Lebanon because it would be seen as an admission of defeat. On the other hand, we are unable to advance or take the initiative.”

The report attributed this impasse largely to the inability of the Zionist military to effectively counter Hezbollah’s drone operations.

It further stated that senior officials believe the region is closely monitoring Hezbollah’s success, and that other groups—particularly in Gaza—are likely to seek similar capabilities. The report also noted that such drones could be smuggled into the West Bank with relative ease.

The newspaper concluded that frustration within the Zionist military is becoming increasingly visible, as what was initially intended to be a strategic trap for Hezbollah has instead turned into a strategic trap for the Zionist regime itself.

It added that the evolving battlefield reality has grown more complex than before the war, due both to the limitations of the Israeli military and to Iran’s success in reuniting resistance fronts and linking regional developments. (PW)

Lebanon, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan issued a strong statement warning against sectarian incitement and emphasizing that no disagreement justifies offense, as he identified Zionist-aligned media outlets as the most dangerous threat to Lebanon’s unity.

National Ethics Reject Offense, Unity Remains Essential

Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan stressed that Lebanon’s religious, national, and ethical heritage categorically rejects any form of insult, regardless of political or sectarian differences. He affirmed that the Christian community, like all other Lebanese communities, is a fundamental pillar and an essential partner in the country.

He noted that responsible criticism aimed at protecting Lebanon is legitimate, but warned against what he described as “paid criticism” designed to destabilize the country and fuel internal divisions.

Zionist Media Outlets Driving Division

Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan warned that Zionist-aligned media outlets are actively fueling national fragmentation, describing them as entities skilled in inciting national crises and religious destruction.

He emphasized that disagreement must never be allowed to turn into offense, reaffirming that the standard must remain rooted in human conscience and ethical responsibility, especially as Lebanon faces mounting external pressure.

Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan also reaffirmed the national role of Bechara Al-Rahi, stating that His Beatitude Patriarch Bechara Al-Rahi is a legitimate national partner entitled to responsible positions, while firmly rejecting any attempt to transform political differences into sectarian hostility.

Shiite Community Bears Greatest Injustice

In the second part of his statement, Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan declared that the Shiite community has endured the greatest injustice in Lebanon, despite decades of sacrifice in defense of the nation.

He stated that if loyalty to Lebanon and its sovereignty were defined as a sect, it would be embodied by the Shiite community, underscoring what he described as its historic commitment to the country.

Warning Against Sedition and National Collapse

Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan warned of what he called “masked sedition” and “dirty political investment” aimed at pushing Lebanon toward national collapse, particularly through efforts that support direct negotiations with what he described as terrorist Israel.

He cautioned against falling into sectarian destruction, warning that certain actors are seeking to dismantle Lebanon’s historical unity and ignite Christian–Muslim hostility.

“There is no greater danger to Lebanon than those who promote religious strife and sectarian conflict,” Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan stressed.

Concluding his remarks, he emphasized that the central duty of all Lebanese communities is to serve the nation and preserve its unity.

“The fundamental commandment is to serve Lebanon—not to become fuel for national destruction,” Sheikh Ahmed Qabalan stated.

The Full Statement

Out of general responsibility and what it entails, I say: our religious and national heritage and ethics do not permit any offense, no matter how much we disagree with the other side. The Christian community, like the rest of the Lebanese communities, is a solid pillar and a constituent partner in this dear country. None of us commits or promotes offense.

We do not fear those who criticize responsibly for the sake of Lebanon; rather, we fear those who turn paid criticism into a profession in order to burn Lebanon. There is no greater danger to this country than Zionist-aligned media outlets that are skilled in the game of national massacres and religious destruction.

His Beatitude Patriarch Bechara Al-Rahi is a national partner and has the right to a responsible position, and we categorically reject that disagreement be turned into offense. The standard is human and ethical conscience, and what is required for this country crucified on the cross of Zionist terrorism.

None of us deviates from the dignity of Jesus Christ and the Prophet Muhammad, and the obligations of the heavenly covenants and their balance. Rather, the concern lies in the dens of the regional and international game and those who align with it inside Lebanon. What is required of the Shiite community at the national level is equally required of the Christian community.

For the sake of history, I say: there is no grievance in this country greater than the injustice suffered by the Shiite community, despite what it has offered to this dear nation for decades. If loyalty to Lebanon and its sovereignty were a sect, then loyalty would be the Shiite sect.

What we fear is the sedition of queues and masks, and the game of dirty investment that serves the project of national suicide supporting direct negotiation with terrorist Israel. Beware of falling into the sedition of sectarian destruction, for there are those who want the destruction of Lebanon and the tearing apart of its historical unity.

There is no greater danger to Lebanon than those who promote religious sedition and Christian–Muslim hostility. The fundamental commandment is to serve Lebanon, not to be fuel for national incinerators.

(PW)

United States, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Donald Trump formally notified Congress that hostilities between the United States and Iran have ended, a move widely seen as an attempt to bypass the 60-day deadline for congressional authorization under the War Powers Resolution.

In a letter dated May 1 addressed to House Speaker Mike Johnson, Trump stated that combat operations ceased following a ceasefire initiated on April 7, which has since been extended.

“There has been no exchange of fire between United States Forces and Iran since April 7, 2026. The hostilities that began on February 28, 2026 have been terminated,” Trump wrote.

Ceasefire Used to Halt War Powers Clock

The White House argues that the cessation of hostilities effectively pauses the War Powers timeline, which requires the president to obtain congressional approval within 60 days of initiating military action or withdraw forces.

The conflict began on February 28 under what Trump described as “Operation Epic Fury,” marking a large-scale US–Israeli military escalation against Iran. According to the administration, the April 7 ceasefire halts the legal countdown, allowing the executive branch to avoid immediate congressional authorization.

US War Secretary Pete Hegseth reinforced this position, telling lawmakers that the current ceasefire effectively stops the 60-day clock.

Military Pressure Continues Despite Ceasefire

Despite declaring an end to active hostilities, Washington continues to maintain a significant military presence across the region, including naval deployments and an ongoing blockade targeting Iranian ports and vessels.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent indicated that the maritime restrictions will remain in place until conditions return to what he described as “pre–February 27 freedom of navigation” in the Strait of Hormuz—one of the world’s most critical energy corridors.

Trump acknowledged that “the threat posed by Iran remains significant,” adding that US forces will continue repositioning to counter Iranian and allied forces while safeguarding American interests.

Legal Challenges and Political Backlash Mount

The administration’s interpretation is expected to face serious challenges in Congress, particularly from Democrats who argue the war lacked proper authorization from the outset.

Legal experts have also questioned the White House’s position, noting that the continuation of a naval blockade—widely regarded under international law as an act of war—undermines claims that hostilities have ended.

The War Powers Resolution, enacted in 1973, requires presidents to notify Congress within 48 hours of military engagement and limits unauthorized operations to 60 days.

Trump, however, reiterated longstanding executive branch objections to the law, stating that many consider it unconstitutional.

Congress Remains Divided

Efforts to curb the administration’s war authority have repeatedly failed, with recent congressional votes to restrict military action against Iran falling short.

Some Republican lawmakers have called for formal authorization if hostilities resume, while others continue to back the president’s approach. Democrats, meanwhile, are pushing for stronger oversight.

Senator Todd Young emphasized that any renewed conflict must involve Congress, stressing the legislature’s constitutional role in decisions of war.

The administration has signaled it is not preparing for immediate new strikes, opting instead to sustain economic and military pressure—particularly through maritime restrictions—as part of its broader strategy toward Iran.

Palestine, PUREWILAYAH.COM — At least 31 people were injured after Israeli forces attacked the Al-Sumud (“Resilience”) humanitarian fleet as it attempted to deliver aid to the Gaza Strip.

According to a statement issued by the organizers, the fleet that carries humanitarian supplies, fuel, and essential goods was targeted while en route to Gaza in an effort to break the ongoing naval blockade imposed on the territory.

International Activists Among the Injured

According to the statement, those wounded include activists from multiple countries, underscoring the international nature of the mission. The injured comprise four individuals from New Zealand and Australia, three from Italy and the United States, two each from Canada, the Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom, Colombia, and Germany, and one each from Hungary, Ukraine, France, Poland, and Portugal.

The convoy emphasized that the mission was purely humanitarian, aimed at delivering urgently needed medical supplies and fuel to ports facing severe logistical strain.

Fleet Targeted in International Waters

Reports indicate that Israeli naval forces struck several vessels belonging to the Al-Sumud fleet in international waters near the Greek island of Crete. Dozens of international activists aboard the ships were also detained during the operation.

The incident adds to a growing record of attacks on humanitarian convoys attempting to reach Gaza, drawing renewed scrutiny over the enforcement of the blockade and its humanitarian consequences.

Turkish Activists Prepare to Reinforce Mission

In parallel developments, a group of Turkish activists has begun preparing additional vessels to join the Al-Sumud fleet, as part of a broader initiative to challenge the blockade and sustain humanitarian deliveries to Gaza.

The move reflects increasing public and international pressure to address the worsening humanitarian situation in the enclave, as aid groups continue to warn of severe shortages in medical supplies, fuel, and basic necessities.

The Al-Sumud fleet had set out to deliver critical assistance while drawing global attention to conditions in Gaza, where access to essential resources remains heavily restricted. (PW)

Iran, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Sayyed Mojtaba Khamenei, emphasized that teachers and workers stand at the core of Iran’s future trajectory, describing them as decisive pillars in the country’s ongoing cultural and economic struggle.

In a message issued on the occasion of Workers’ Day and Teachers’ Day, he stated that the progress of any nation depends on two essential pillars: knowledge and action. Within this framework, teachers play a foundational role in shaping future generations, while workers drive the country’s economic engine.

Teachers Shape the Identity of Future Generations

Ayatullah Khamenei highlighted that the responsibility of teachers extends far beyond transferring knowledge, encompassing the development of skills, worldview, and identity.

He noted that students raised under the guidance of a teacher will, in the near future, reflect their teachers’ values, behavior, and mindset across all aspects of life—from family environments to workplaces and broader society.

According to him, teachers represent the most influential element in the cultural arena, directly shaping the intellectual and moral direction of society.

Workers Drive National Economic Strength

On the economic front, Ayatullah Khamenei described the field of labor as a vast arena spanning all sectors of society, from households and offices to agriculture, industry, and services.

He stressed that the greater the commitment and work ethic within this sphere, the more firmly a country’s progress is secured.

In some cases, he added, a dedicated worker may attain a status worthy of recognition comparable to that of a teacher, underscoring the dignity and value of labor.

Iran Enters a New Phase of National Struggle

Referring to Iran’s achievements after more than four decades of sustained effort, Ayatullah Khamenei stated that the country has already demonstrated significant military capabilities to the world.

However, he underscored that the next stage lies in prevailing in the economic and cultural domains.

“Teachers are the most effective link in the cultural struggle, and workers are among the most effective elements in the economic struggle,” he stated, describing the two groups as the backbone of these critical arenas.

Call for Practical Support Beyond Symbolic Praise

Ayatullah Khamenei stressed that symbolic recognition alone is insufficient, calling for deeper and more practical support for both teachers and workers.

He urged greater involvement of families in educational institutions and encouraged prioritizing domestic products as a direct means of supporting national labor.

He also called on business owners to avoid workforce reductions wherever possible and instead view workers as valuable assets within production and service sectors.

At the same time, he emphasized the role of the government in supporting such constructive efforts.

Toward the Peak of Progress Through National Identity

Concluding his message, Ayatullah Khamenei expressed confidence that Iran will continue advancing toward higher levels of progress by strengthening its Iranian-Islamic identity among the youth and expanding the use of domestically produced goods.

He affirmed that this path will be accelerated through divine support, leading the nation toward its long-term goals.

The Text of The Message is As Follows:

In the Name of God, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful

The 11th and 12th of Ordibehesht are days on which the status of the worker and the dignity of the teacher are honored. Beyond verbal and symbolic appreciation—which in its own place is appropriate and correct—the progress of any country depends on the two wings of knowledge and action.

The teacher plays a role in the very first stage of realizing this objective. The grave responsibility of imparting knowledge, enhancing skills, and a significant part of developing insight and shaping the identity of the future generation rests upon them. Students—whether in schools, universities, or seminaries—who grow alongside any teacher will, in the not-so-distant future, apply the skills they have learned and the knowledge they have acquired; and very likely, in their character, behavior, and speech, across various arenas—from the warm circle of the family to the workplace and the streets—they will act as a mirror reflecting the conduct and words of their teachers.

On the other hand, the arena of work is a vast field spanning the entire country—from within homes, offices, business units, and mosques, to farms, workshops, factories, mines, and a wide range of service professions. The more this broad field is enriched with the two elements of diligence and commitment—which are among the pillars of any great success—the more the country’s progress will be guaranteed and strengthened.

We know that a worker, in the light of commitment and excellence in performance, may at times attain such a position that it becomes worthy—just as one would kiss the kind hand of a teacher and mentor—to also kiss the capable and skillful hands of that worker in gratitude and appreciation. This, of course, is something that is cultivated first within the embrace of one’s earliest educators—namely one’s parents—and thereafter through benefiting from the presence of a teacher.

Now that the Islamic Republic of Iran, after more than forty-seven years of struggle, relying on divine grace, has demonstrated part of its remarkable capabilities to the world in the military confrontation with the enemies of its progress and advancement, it must also, in the stage of economic and cultural jihad, disappoint them and defeat them.

Teachers will be the most effective link in the cultural struggle, and workers among the most effective elements in the economic struggle; to the extent that it can be claimed these two are the backbone of the cultural and economic arenas. Therefore, it is necessary that they become fully aware of the importance of their special position—beyond that of a mere job for which wages are received.

At the same time, it must be noted that verbal commendations—whether annual or occasional—though appropriate, are not sufficient; appreciation for the efforts of these two groups must go deeper and be more practical than this. I believe that just as the noble people of Iran, by taking to the fields and streets, offer fitting support to their country’s armed forces, it is also appropriate that they demonstrate strong support in assisting teachers and workers.

Among these, greater participation of families of students in the administration of schools and universities should be facilitated more than before. Likewise, by prioritizing the consumption of domestically produced goods, productive workers must be supported. In particular, owners of businesses that have suffered damage should, as much as possible, refrain from reducing their workforce and dismissing employees—whether in production units or service sectors—and instead regard every worker as a form of wealth for that production or service unit. Of course, the respected government should also support this benevolent action to the extent possible.

Beloved Iran, just as through years of effort it has emerged as a military power, God willing and by His grace, through defining the contours of Iranian-Islamic identity and deepening its influence within the minds and souls of the youth of this country—by the hands of educators and teachers—and by prioritizing the consumption of domestically produced goods, which are the result of the efforts of hardworking Iranian workers, will traverse the path toward the peaks of progress and advancement. This, by the good prayers and the intercession of our Master—may God hasten his reappearance—will be realized more swiftly and more perfectly, by the permission of God Almighty.

And peace be upon you, and God’s mercy and blessings.

Sayyed Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei

Iran, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Commander-in-Chief of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army, Major General Amir Hatami, stated that Iran’s armed forces stand firmly against any threat, emphasizing that the military’s strength is rooted in the support of the Iranian people.

In a message marking Teacher’s Day, Hatami said the army has reached a high level of preparedness by drawing on the knowledge of educators, the guidance of the leadership, and accumulated battlefield experience.

“The Army of the Islamic Republic of Iran, relying on the power and backing of the great Iranian nation, stands as it has always done against any threat and hostility,” he stated.

Preparedness Built on Experience and Guidance

Hatami underscored that the army has significantly enhanced its defense capabilities through lessons learned from past conflicts, particularly the eight-year imposed war and more recent confrontations.

He said the armed forces have come to a clear understanding of the need to continuously elevate their operational readiness in order to fulfill their core mission.

“The army has learned that it must strengthen its defensive power and readiness in such a way that it can carry out its grave responsibility—preserving the independence, territorial integrity, and the Islamic Republic of Iran—in the best possible manner,” he said.

People’s Support as Strategic Foundation

The army chief highlighted that the backing of the Iranian people remains a central pillar of national defense, describing it as a decisive factor in sustaining military strength.

He also pointed to the role of committed teachers, instructors, and trainers in shaping the capabilities of the armed forces, noting that their contributions form a critical part of the army’s success.

Standing Firm Under Leadership

Hatami reaffirmed that the armed forces operate under the guidance of the Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatullah Sayyed Ali Khamenei, and remain committed to defending the country with determination and clarity.

“Today, the Army of the Islamic Republic of Iran stands more prepared than ever, resolute and with revolutionary insight, ready to confront any threat and enemy,” he said.

Iran maintains sustained military readiness and a strong deterrence posture, as its armed forces prepare to confront evolving threats while defending sovereignty and territorial integrity. (PW)

United States, PUREWILAYAH.COM — A U.S. Navy destroyer has been disabled in the Pacific Ocean following a major onboard fire, leaving the vessel without power and propulsion for a period of time.

American media reported that the guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins, an Arleigh Burke-class warship, suffered a significant fire in a key technical section of the ship.

According to CBS News, the incident caused a complete power outage and knocked out the vessel’s propulsion system—placing it in what naval terminology describes as “dead in the water.”

Growing Questions Over U.S. Naval Readiness

The fire reportedly broke out in one of the ship’s main engineering compartments, directly impacting essential operational systems.

The loss of both electrical power and propulsion capability effectively rendered the destroyer immobile in open waters, raising concerns over onboard system resilience and emergency response effectiveness.

The incident comes amid increasing scrutiny over the operational readiness of the U.S. Navy, particularly regarding aging platforms and reliability challenges.

In recent months, multiple reports have highlighted concerns about maintenance backlogs and system failures across segments of the fleet.

Previous Issues With Advanced Warships

The development follows earlier criticism directed at the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford, which has faced repeated issues related to its advanced technology systems and reliability performance.

In a separate development reported earlier by Bloomberg, two U.S. Navy destroyers were forced to withdraw while attempting to pass through the Strait of Hormuz following warnings issued by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

According to a regional intelligence source cited in the report, the two warships turned back after encountering direct warnings, with the IRGC also deploying a drone in the vicinity of the vessels.

The disabling of USS Higgins adds to a growing pattern of operational challenges facing the U.S. Navy, as incidents at sea and forced withdrawals from strategic waterways continue to raise questions about its ability to sustain extended maritime operations. (PW)

Iran, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that the United States is concealing the true cost of the war, declaring that official Pentagon figures do not reflect the real financial burden imposed on American taxpayers.

In a statement published on the social media platform X, Araghchi said the war has already cost the United States at least $100 billion—four times higher than what Washington claims publicly.

“The Pentagon is lying. Netanyahu’s gamble has directly cost America $100 billion so far—four times what is officially claimed,” Araghchi wrote.

He stressed that this figure represents only the visible portion of the damage, warning that the actual economic burden is far greater.

“Indirect costs for U.S. taxpayers are far higher. The monthly burden for each American household is $500 and rising rapidly,” he added.

Araghchi also criticized Washington’s alignment with Tel Aviv, stating: “Israel First always means America Last.”

From Official Claims to Independent Analysis

Araghchi’s remarks come as Pentagon official Jules Hurst told Congress that “Operation Epic Fury” has cost approximately $25 billion.

Beyond Araghchi’s statements, independent analytical reports—including an Al Jazeera assessment—present a far deeper picture of the war’s economic impact, pointing to a massive gap between official figures and broader realities.

Estimates cited by analysts place the real cost between $630 billion and $1 trillion, reflecting the cumulative impact on the U.S. economy, military expenditures, and domestic financial pressure.

Cost Imbalance Exposes Structural Weakness

The financial structure of the war reveals a severe imbalance. The United States is engaged in a high-cost military model, while Iran has imposed a low-cost war of attrition.

In air defense operations, U.S. forces have used Patriot missiles costing approximately $4 million each to intercept drones valued at around $50,000.

Within the first days of the war, missile consumption alone exceeded levels seen in multiple years of previous conflicts, highlighting the unsustainable cost ratio.

U.S. Bases Sustain Heavy Damage Across West Asia

Iranian strikes have caused significant damage to American military infrastructure across West Asia, including bases in Kuwait, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan.

Repair costs continue to rise, with estimates indicating that damage to the U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain alone exceeds $200 million.

War Impact Reaches American Households

The consequences have extended directly into daily life in the United States. Disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz have driven fuel prices higher, increasing pressure on households.

Gasoline prices have surged to $4.23 per gallon, while the estimated monthly burden per household has reached $500 and continues to rise.

Long-Term Costs Still Expanding

Analysts warn that current figures represent only the initial phase. Long-term expenses—including veteran care, weapons replacement, and expanded military budgets—are expected to push the total cost significantly higher.

With a proposed $1.5 trillion defense budget, the United States is entering its largest military expansion since World War II.

The gap between official U.S. figures and broader assessments reflects a deepening crisis in transparency and strategy.

As the war’s economic toll continues to expand, it exposes structural vulnerabilities in Washington’s approach—raising serious questions about sustainability and the long-term consequences for the American economy. (PW)

Palestine, PUREWILAYAH.COM - When examining annexation plans in the West Bank, the issue extends far beyond election rhetoric or internal political debates within the occupying entity. It is part of a cumulative trajectory being imposed on the ground for years.

This assessment comes from a special report by the Palestinian Information Center, which highlights a trajectory reflected in the expansion of settlements, the construction of bypass roads, land confiscation, and the strengthening of the Civil Administration—gradually transforming temporary military control into permanent colonial sovereignty.

Within this context, the contours of the current confrontation in the West Bank are taking shape, as geography, legal frameworks, and demographic structures are being reshaped to serve a settler-colonial project aimed at systematically absorbing Palestinian land.

What Do Annexation Plans in the West Bank Actually Mean?

Politically and legally, annexation refers to the transfer of occupied land from a status governed by the laws of military occupation to one considered part of the occupying state’s sovereign territory. However, the Palestinian case is distinct: the occupation did not wait for a formal, comprehensive declaration to begin annexation in practice.

Over the past decades, a full system has been built linking large parts of the West Bank to the occupation’s security, judicial, and economic structures, while Palestinians are confined to fragmented enclaves—forced to navigate checkpoints, gates, and administrative classifications.

According to experts, annexation plans encompass multiple scenarios. There is formal annexation, which may be declared through governmental decisions or parliamentary legislation covering major settlements, the Jordan Valley, or Area C. More dangerous, however, is “creeping annexation,” which proceeds quietly through administrative and legal tools that may appear fragmented but ultimately serve a single outcome: entrenching Israeli control and eliminating any possibility of a geographically contiguous, viable Palestinian entity.

This creeping annexation manifests through settlement expansion, the legalization of outposts, their integration into dedicated infrastructure networks, and the granting of full civil privileges to settlers—while Palestinians remain under harsh military rule. The question is no longer whether annexation has begun, but how far it has progressed and how its mechanisms can be exposed and challenged.

From Concept to Reality on the Ground

These plans did not emerge in a vacuum. From its inception, the Zionist project has sought to control the maximum amount of land with the minimum number of Palestinians. Following the occupation of the West Bank in 1967, successive Israeli governments—regardless of political orientation—worked to establish irreversible facts on the ground.

Settlements were not merely residential communities, but instruments of sovereignty, fragmentation, and dispossession.

In recent years, these efforts have accelerated. Israeli legislation, decisions by right-wing ministers, and the transfer of increasing authority from the military to civilian ministries led by settlers all indicate a deliberate move to abandon the temporary framework of occupation and consolidate annexation as a permanent reality. What is marketed internally as the “legal normalization” of settlements is, in fact, a direct legitimization of Palestinian land theft.

The Jordan Valley occupies a central position in this plan—not only due to its vast area and agricultural importance, but also because it represents the eastern depth of the West Bank and its border with Jordan. Controlling it would effectively suffocate any future Palestinian sovereignty, turning Palestinian cities into isolated islands with no real outlet.

Moayad Shaaban, head of the Wall and Settlement Resistance Commission, stated that a recent decision by the so-called Israeli “cabinet” to secretly approve the establishment of dozens of new settlements marks a highly dangerous escalation in the acceleration of the settler-colonial project, aimed at imposing irreversible facts on the ground.

According to Shaaban, this decision follows a series of measures taken throughout 2025, including separating 13 settlement neighborhoods into independent settlements, approving 22 additional settlement sites in a later phase, and subsequently authorizing 19 more—reflecting a cumulative and systematic approach that transforms gradual expansion into rapid quantitative and qualitative leaps.

How Annexation Is Implemented Without Formal Declaration

The occupation has learned from past experiences that explicit declarations may provoke broader international opposition—even if limited to verbal condemnation. As a result, annexation is often fragmented into smaller steps.

Land is first confiscated under the pretext of being “state land,” Palestinian communities are then denied building permits, a settlement outpost is established, later legalized, connected to infrastructure, and eventually incorporated into long-term development plans. What begins as an exception becomes the norm.

Urban planning is also used as a direct tool. Palestinian villages across large areas of the West Bank are either restricted by discriminatory master plans or denied them altogether, meaning that any home, school, or agricultural structure becomes subject to demolition. These are not neutral administrative measures, but components of a demographic engineering strategy aimed at forcing Palestinians into displacement or reducing their presence in targeted areas.

This dynamic is particularly evident in Jerusalem and its surroundings, where the occupation has worked for years to link major settlement blocs, sever the natural connection between the northern and southern West Bank, and isolate the city from its Palestinian hinterland. While the annexation of Jerusalem was declared long ago, what is unfolding around it today represents a continuation of the same project on a broader scale.

According to the Commission, since early 2023—coinciding with the formation of an extremist right-wing government that prioritized colonial settlement expansion—the occupation has confiscated more than 75,000 dunams of Palestinian land under various pretexts, including declarations of state land, nature reserves, and military orders.

Why Do These Plans Pose an Existential Threat?

The first danger is geographic. Any large-scale or gradual annexation would fragment the West Bank into isolated cantons, severing Palestinian communities from their agricultural lands and water resources. This undermines not only the concept of a Palestinian state, but also the daily survival conditions of people whose livelihoods depend on land and mobility.

The second danger is legal and political. Annexation seeks to normalize a crime and redefine occupation as sovereignty. Once this shift occurs, reversing it becomes far more difficult, and settlements begin to be framed—by some international actors—as a “reality” rather than an illegal colonial structure. This transformation in language is critical, as it paves the way for the erosion of international positions and encourages further aggression.

The third danger is demographic and humanitarian. In areas under threat of annexation—or already experiencing it—Palestinians face a combination of economic pressure, military raids, settler violence, restrictions on construction, and movement limitations. The objective is not only to control land, but to exhaust the Palestinian population, break its will, and force displacement. Annexation, therefore, is not a mere legal issue, but a policy of gradual uprooting.

The International Position and Its Limits

There is broad consensus that international law considers the West Bank occupied territory and rejects settlement activity and annexation by force. However, the Palestinian experience demonstrates that clear legal frameworks do not necessarily translate into enforcement.

Many capitals issue condemnations while continuing to engage with the occupation as if it were above accountability. This gap between declared positions and actual practice has provided the occupation with valuable time to expand its project.

A realistic assessment is necessary. International pressure remains important, as does legal and moral isolation of the occupation. However, reliance on condemnations alone has proven insufficient. Without tangible costs imposed on the occupation, annexation plans will continue in various forms.

What Does Annexation Mean for Palestinians?

For Palestinians in the West Bank, annexation means that daily life will become increasingly harsh and complex. Farmers may be denied access to their land, villages may be encircled, cities isolated, and families deprived of the right to build or expand naturally.

It also means that the confrontation is no longer limited to a soldier at a checkpoint, but extends to an entire system designed to entrench settlement as a permanent reality. Resistance, therefore, takes multiple forms: steadfast presence on the land, documentation of violations, popular mobilization, legal advocacy, and media efforts to expose the occupation’s narrative that frames annexation as a matter of security or border disputes.

In reality, it is a clear settler-colonial project, and any description short of that distorts the truth.

Reading the Next Phase

The coming phase is likely to witness further escalation, whether through formal decisions or the expansion of creeping annexation. The Israeli right does not conceal its agenda, openly declaring that the West Bank is not subject to negotiation but a space for permanent expansion.

Given the imbalance of power, the occupation may prefer incremental steps to avoid large-scale international reactions, while benefiting from regional and global distractions.

However, this does not mean the project proceeds without resistance or cost. The Palestinian experience shows that land targeted for annexation remains a constant arena of confrontation, and that attempts to impose facts are consistently met with steadfast resistance.

Exposing annexation as a direct extension of settlement and apartheid remains a central task in the political and media struggle—no less important than confrontation on the ground.

A Reality Already in Motion

Annexation is not a distant future scenario; it is a reality being shaped daily across hills, valleys, and threatened villages.

Any serious reading of developments in the West Bank must begin from this point: the occupation is not managing the land temporarily—it is working to absorb it.

From here, defending the narrative, supporting the steadfastness of the people, and exposing the colonial structure of the project become integral parts of the struggle to defend Palestine itself—not merely a passing political debate. (PW)

Gaza, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Israeli occupation forces continued their deadly assaults across the Gaza Strip, killing at least three Palestinians and wounding several others in a new wave of attacks that further violate the ceasefire and intensify the humanitarian crisis.

Medical sources confirmed that three civilians were martyred and another critically wounded after an Israeli drone strike targeted an animal-drawn cart near Kuwait Roundabout, south of al-Zaytoun neighborhood, east of Gaza City.

The wounded were transferred to al-Saraya field hospital, where several cases were reported as severe. The attack also disrupted movement along Salah al-Din Street.

Civilians Targeted Across Multiple Areas

In central Gaza, Israeli reconnaissance aircraft struck a group of civilians near al-Aqsa Hospital in Deir al-Balah, injuring at least six people, some in critical condition.

In a separate incident, al-Ahli Baptist Hospital received an elderly man who was shot by Israeli forces while standing near al-Ramla School in al-Shujaiya neighborhood, east of Gaza City.

These attacks form part of a continuing pattern of strikes targeting civilian areas despite the declared ceasefire.

Death Toll Continues to Rise Under Ceasefire Violations

The Palestinian Health Ministry reported that, in a preliminary toll for the previous day, the number of martyrs since the ceasefire agreement took effect on October 11, 2025, has reached 823, with 2,308 wounded.

The ministry also confirmed that 763 bodies have been recovered during the same period.

Since the beginning of the Israeli war on Gaza on October 7, 2023, the total number of martyrs has risen to 72,599, with 172,411 wounded.

Ongoing Aggression Deepens Humanitarian Crisis

Israeli occupation forces continue to violate the ceasefire through repeated airstrikes, shootings, and sustained military presence on Palestinian land, alongside a continuing blockade that has further deteriorated living conditions across Gaza.

The ongoing attacks highlight the persistent failure to uphold ceasefire commitments, as civilians remain the primary victims of continued Israeli aggression. (PW)

Lebanon, PUREWILAYAH.COM — The Islamic Resistance in Hezbollah announced that it carried out 10 operations against positions of the Israeli occupation army across multiple areas in southern Lebanon on April 30.

The operations were conducted in response to continued crimes by the occupation forces and repeated violations of the ceasefire.

The total of 10 operations marks the highest number carried out by Hezbollah in a single day since the ceasefire took effect, highlighting a sharp escalation in the pace of resistance activity.

During these attacks, at least one Israeli soldier was killed and a minimum of four others were wounded.

Escalation Marks Record Since Ceasefire

This level of coordinated action represents an unprecedented single-day surge in Hezbollah’s operations since the truce began, signaling a shift in the intensity and frequency of engagements on the Lebanon front.

The operations targeted multiple positions of the Israeli occupation army, reflecting a broader operational spread rather than isolated strikes.

FPV Drones Reshape Battlefield Dynamics

Hezbollah fighters primarily relied on FPV (First-Person View) suicide drones in these operations—advanced systems guided via fiber-optic cables, making interception or electronic disruption effectively impossible.

Equipped with RPG warheads, these drones have emerged as a major challenge for Israeli forces in the recent phase of the war, increasingly shaping battlefield outcomes.

Israeli Officials Admit Deterrence Is Eroding

Supporting reports from Hebrew media indicate that Israeli officials have formally informed the United States that their deterrence against Hezbollah is nearing collapse.

According to Israel’s Channel 12, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu discussed the issue in a phone call with U.S. President Donald Trump.

Netanyahu reportedly stressed that the current policy of “restraint” in Lebanon weakens Israel’s deterrence and benefits Hezbollah, warning that limiting responses without initiative allows the Resistance to recover and strengthen its position.

Pressure on Washington, Risk of Wider Escalation

Israeli officials have urged Washington to shorten the diplomatic timeframe with Lebanon to no later than mid-May—roughly two to three weeks—arguing that continued Hezbollah attacks undermine the chances of successful negotiations.

They are pressing for a clear deadline, warning that failure of talks should open the door to a broader military escalation plan.

Hebrew media also noted that U.S.-imposed restrictions on Israeli actions are viewed as limiting military freedom and giving Hezbollah time to reorganize. As a result, Israeli decision-making is increasingly tied to Washington’s broader strategic calculations, particularly regarding its engagement with Iran.

Amid these developments, Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir visited the northern front, stating that forces are implementing political directives while awaiting decisions on the next phase, as the situation remains open to either escalation or a redefinition of engagement rules. (PW)

Iran, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Ayatollah Sayyed Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei, Leader of the Islamic Revolution, declared that the future of the Persian Gulf will be defined by the complete absence of American influence, describing recent developments as a turning point toward a new regional and global order led by the nations of the region.

In a message issued on the occasion of National Persian Gulf Day, Ayatollah Khamenei framed the strategic waterway not merely as a geographic asset, but as a cornerstone of civilizational identity and global economic stability. He emphasized that the region’s security must be determined by its own nations, not external powers.

“By the grace and power of God, the bright future of the Persian Gulf region will be a future without America, and in service of the progress, comfort, and prosperity of its nations.”

U.S. Presence Declared Primary Source of Insecurity

Ayatollah Khamenei directly challenged the legitimacy of the American military presence across the Persian Gulf, asserting that decades of foreign intervention have brought only instability, exploitation, and repeated aggression.

He stated that recent events—particularly what he described as the humiliating failure of Washington’s latest military campaign—have exposed the fragility of U.S. power and shifted perceptions even among allied governments.

“Today, it has been proven not only to global public opinion and the nations of the region, but even to rulers and governments, that the presence of American foreigners and their entrenchment in the lands of the Persian Gulf is the most important factor of insecurity in the region.”

He further underscored that U.S. military installations in the region lack even the capacity to secure themselves:

“The hollow American bases do not even have the ability to ensure their own security, let alone provide security for their dependents and regional clients.”

Iran’s Resistance Shapes New Strategic Reality

Positioning Iran at the center of resistance against foreign domination, Ayatollah Khamenei described the Islamic Revolution as the decisive turning point in expelling imperial influence from the Persian Gulf.

He highlighted Iran’s historical sacrifices—from expelling colonial forces to defending sovereignty in modern conflicts—as the foundation of today’s strategic posture.

“The Islamic Revolution was the turning point in cutting off the hands of arrogant powers from the Persian Gulf region.”

Referring to the recent escalation and confrontation, he declared that a new chapter is unfolding following what he described as America’s failed campaign:

“Today, after two months since the largest military mobilization and aggression of the world’s bullies in the region, and the disgraceful defeat of America in its plan, a new chapter for the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz is being written.”

Strait of Hormuz and Regional Sovereignty

Ayatollah Khamenei stressed Iran’s central role in managing the Strait of Hormuz, describing it as both a strategic responsibility and a source of stability for global trade—provided it is governed free from foreign interference.

“The Islamic Iran, by giving thanks in action for the blessing of managing the Strait of Hormuz, will secure the Persian Gulf region and will eliminate the exploitation of this waterway by hostile enemies.”

He added that new legal and management frameworks for the strait will serve all regional nations:

“The new legal rules and the implementation of management over the Strait of Hormuz will bring comfort and progress for the benefit of all the nations of the region.”

Unified Nation, Expanding Resistance Front

The message also emphasized the unity of the Iranian people and the expansion of resistance beyond national borders, portraying a mobilized society prepared to defend all dimensions of national strength—from territory to advanced technologies.

“Today, the miraculous awakening of the Iranian nation is not limited to tens of millions ready to sacrifice their lives in the struggle against Zionism and bloodthirsty America.”

“Ninety million honorable Iranian compatriots, inside and outside the country, consider all identity, spiritual, human, scientific, industrial, and advanced technologies as their national capital and will safeguard them just like their land, sea, and air borders.”

Toward a New Regional and Global Order

Concluding his message, Ayatollah Khamenei framed the current trajectory as the beginning of a broader transformation that extends beyond the Persian Gulf, signaling the decline of Western dominance and the rise of independent regional powers.

“This chain of victories, realized by the grace of God and under the policies of resistance and the strategy of a strong Iran, is the dawn of a new regional and global order.”

He reiterated that external powers have no legitimate place in the region:

“We and our neighbors in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman are ‘of one destiny,’ and foreigners who come from thousands of kilometers away with greed and malice have no place in it—except in the depths of its waters.”

The Text of The Message is As Follows:

One of the unparalleled blessings of Almighty God for the Muslim nations of our region—especially the noble people of Islamic Iran—is the gift of the “Persian Gulf.” A blessing that goes beyond a mere body of water; it has shaped part of our identity and civilization and, in addition to serving as a point of connection among nations, has created a vital and unique route for the global economy through the Strait of Hormuz and thereafter the Sea of Oman.

This strategic asset has, over past centuries, aroused the greed of many devils. The record of repeated aggressions by European and American foreigners, the insecurity, damages, and numerous threats imposed on the countries of the region are only a small part of the sinister plots of the global arrogant powers against the inhabitants of the Persian Gulf region—the most recent example being the recent acts of thuggery by the Great Satan.

The Iranian nation, which possesses the longest coastline along the Persian Gulf, has made the greatest sacrifices for the independence of the Persian Gulf and in confronting foreigners and aggressors—from expelling the Portuguese and liberating the Strait of Hormuz, which became the basis for naming the 10th of Ordibehesht as National Persian Gulf Day, to fighting against Dutch colonialism and the epics of resistance against British colonialism, and so on. However, the Islamic Revolution was the turning point in curbing the influence of arrogant powers in the Persian Gulf region. Today, after two months since the largest military mobilization and aggression by the world’s bullies in the region, and the disgraceful defeat of America in its plan, a new chapter for the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz is being written.

The nations of the Persian Gulf region, who for many years had become accustomed to the silence and submission of their rulers in the face of bullies and aggressors, have in the past sixty days witnessed the beautiful manifestations of strength, vigilance, and struggle by the brave men of the naval forces of the Army and the IRGC, alongside the honor and valor of the people and youth of southern Iran in rejecting foreign domination.

Today, by the grace of Almighty God and by the blessing of the blood of the مظلوم martyrs of the third imposed war—especially the great and farsighted Leader of the Islamic Revolution, may his noble station be exalted—it has been proven not only to global public opinion and the nations of the region, but even to kings and rulers of countries, that the presence of American foreigners and their entrenchment and nesting in the lands of the Persian Gulf is the most important cause of insecurity in the region. The hollow American bases do not even have the ability to ensure their own security, let alone provide any hope of securing their dependents and the America-worshippers of the region.

By the will and power of God, the bright future of the Persian Gulf region will be a future without America, and in the service of the progress, comfort, and welfare of its nations. We, together with our neighbors across the waters of the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman, share a “common destiny,” and the foreigners who come from thousands of kilometers away with greed and malice have no place in it except in the depths of its waters. This chain of victory, realized by the grace of the Almighty and under the policies of resistance and the strategy of a strong Iran, is the dawn of a new regional and global order.

Today, the miraculous awakening of the Iranian nation is not limited to tens of millions ready to sacrifice themselves in the struggle against Zionism and blood-shedding America. At the forefront of the unified ranks of the awakened Islamic Ummah, ninety million honorable Iranian compatriots—inside and outside the country—consider all their identity, spiritual, human, scientific, industrial, and advanced foundational and emerging technologies—from nano and bio to nuclear and missile—as their national capital, and they will safeguard them just like their land, sea, and air borders.

Islamic Iran, by giving practical thanks for the blessing of exercising management over the Strait of Hormuz, will secure the Persian Gulf region and will remove the means of exploitation of this waterway by hostile enemies. The legal frameworks and the implementation of new management over the Strait of Hormuz will bring comfort and progress for the benefit of all the nations of the region, and its economic blessings will bring joy to the hearts of the people—God willing, even if the disbelievers detest it.

Sayyed Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei (PW)

Germany, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Friedrich Merz delivered a blunt assessment of Washington’s handling of the Iran conflict, stating that the United States has been “humiliated” and entered the war without a clear strategy for ending it.

Speaking during remarks to students in Marsberg, Merz criticized the lack of strategic planning behind U.S. actions, warning that the absence of an exit plan risks deepening the crisis.

“The problem with conflicts like these is always the same: it’s not just about getting in; you also have to get out. We saw that all too painfully in Afghanistan… We saw it in Iraq.”

Iran Outmaneuvers U.S. Diplomacy

Merz pointed to Iran’s negotiating posture as a decisive factor, describing it as calculated and effective.

“Iranians are obviously very skilled at negotiating—or rather, very skillful at not negotiating—and then letting the Americans travel to Islamabad and leave again without any results,” Merz said during a discussion with high school students in the western town of Marsberg.”

“An entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership, especially by these so-called Revolutionary Guards,” he said.

He noted that diplomatic efforts have failed to produce results, highlighting instances where U.S. officials engaged in talks only to return empty-handed, underscoring what he described as a lack of coherent strategy in Washington.

According to Merz, Iran has proven “stronger than expected,” while the United States has yet to demonstrate a convincing negotiating framework.

Lessons Ignored from Past U.S. Wars

Drawing comparisons to previous American military interventions, the German Chancellor warned that the current trajectory mirrors earlier failures.

He cited the prolonged wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as cautionary examples of conflicts entered without clear long-term planning, suggesting that Washington risks repeating the same strategic miscalculations.

Germany Signals Conditional Role in Hormuz

Despite his criticism, Merz stated that Germany remains prepared to support efforts to stabilize the region, particularly in reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

However, he emphasized that any such role would only come after active hostilities have ceased.

Germany, he said, could contribute mine-clearing capabilities to ensure safe maritime navigation, but not while the conflict is ongoing.

Iranian Response: Western Miscalculation Exposed

In response to Merz’s remarks, Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei said the German leader had effectively acknowledged a broader reality.

He noted that Western political systems continue to misread Iran’s strength, pointing to earlier claims predicting the imminent collapse of the Islamic Republic.

According to Ejei, such misjudgments reflect a deeper failure to understand the role of faith, public resolve, and national cohesion in shaping Iran’s resilience.

A Conflict Without Direction

Merz’s remarks highlight growing unease even among Western leaders regarding the direction of the conflict, as questions mount over Washington’s ability to translate military escalation into political outcomes.

His warning underscores a widening gap between U.S. actions and strategic clarity—one that, in his own words, leaves the world watching a conflict with no clear path forward and a superpower struggling to define its endgame. (PW)

Lebanon, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Sheikh Naim Qassem, Secretary-General of Hezbollah, issued a powerful and far-reaching statement rejecting direct negotiations with Israel, warning that Lebanon’s political authority is endangering the nation’s sovereignty through concessions, miscalculations, and detachment from its own people.

In a sharply articulated address, Hezbollah’s Chief made clear that the resistance does not recognize the legitimacy or outcomes of direct talks under current conditions.

“These direct negotiations and their outcomes are as if they do not exist for us. They do not concern us—neither near nor far.”

Authority Must Return to the People or Lose Its Foundation

Sheikh Naim Qassem framed the crisis as a crisis of legitimacy, stating that no authority can endure while relinquishing national rights and confronting its own resistant society.

“This authority cannot continue while it gives up Lebanon’s rights, concedes land, and stands against its own people.”

Calling for a decisive course correction, Hezbollah’s Chief urged the government to return to national consensus:

“It must return to its people and gather them around it—so it becomes the authority of the people, not the authority of a part.”

He stressed that Lebanon’s stability depends on internal unity grounded in the framework of national agreement—not policies shaped by external pressure or imposed alignments.

Halt Direct Talks, Reverse March 2 Decision

Sheikh Qassem demanded an immediate end to direct negotiations with Israel, describing them as a dangerous deviation that undermines national interests.

“The authority must stop direct negotiations with the Israeli enemy, adopt indirect channels, and revoke its decision of March 2 that criminalizes the resistance and more than half of the Lebanese people.”

He emphasized that this reversal is essential to restoring internal dialogue and prioritizing Lebanon’s national interest without submission to Israeli or foreign dictates.

Five Non-Negotiable Conditions for Any Solution

Outlining a clear path forward, Hezbollah’s Chief identified five essential conditions that must precede any political settlement:

1. A complete halt to Israeli aggression on land, sea, and air

2. Full withdrawal from all occupied Lebanese territory

3. Release of detainees

4. Return of displaced civilians to their homes

5. Comprehensive reconstruction

He defined the conflict in unequivocal terms:

“The problem is aggression. The resistance is a response to aggression—not its cause.”

He reaffirmed that the resistance’s weapons are defensive and necessary in the face of occupation and the exposure of Israeli expansionist objectives.

“We Will Not Abandon Our Weapons”

In one of the most forceful sections of his statement, Sheikh Naim Qassem categorically rejected any calls for disarmament.

“We will not abandon our weapons or our defense. The battlefield has proven the readiness of the resistance for great sacrifice.”

He framed the struggle as a defining choice for the Lebanese people:

“It is a choice between liberation and dignity—or occupation and humiliation. And humiliation is not an option.”

Resistance Holds the Field, Enemy Reaches a Dead End

Reflecting on the course of the confrontation, Hezbollah’s Chief stated that Israeli efforts—backed by the United States—have failed to dismantle the resistance despite extensive military escalation since September 2024.

“The enemy has reached a dead end. This resistance is continuous, strong, and cannot be defeated.”

He highlighted the resilience of fighters, the effectiveness of diverse combat strategies, and the deep public support surrounding the resistance, even amid displacement and heavy sacrifices.

Strategic Misstep: Concessions Amid Strength

Sheikh Qassem pointed to what he described as a critical contradiction: political concessions made at a moment when the resistance had demonstrated strength on the ground.

“In this atmosphere of sacrifice, dignity, and the enemy’s failure, the authority rushed into a humiliating and unnecessary concession—its only justification being submission without return.”

He questioned decisions taken in Washington, including reported arrangements that effectively grant Israel freedom to continue its aggression while limiting Lebanon’s response.

“Has the authority decided to act side by side with the Israeli enemy against its own people?”

Iran’s Role and the Reality of Ceasefire

Hezbollah’s Chief underscored the decisive role of Iran in securing the ceasefire through regional diplomacy.

“The ceasefire would not have been achieved without the Islamic Republic of Iran, following the legendary steadfastness of the resistance and its people.”

He stressed that no external party has the right to negotiate Lebanon’s conditions:

“No one will negotiate on behalf of Lebanon’s terms except Lebanon itself.”

Resistance Will Continue—No Return to Before March 2

Reaffirming the resistance’s course, Sheikh Naim Qassem declared that there will be no return to the pre–March 2 situation, emphasizing continued readiness to confront aggression.

“We will respond to Israeli aggression and confront it. We will not return to what was before.”

He added:

“No matter how much the enemy threatens, we will not retreat, we will not bow, and we will not be defeated.”

A Historic Commitment: Liberation Without Compromise

In a closing declaration, Hezbollah’s Chief reaffirmed unity with national forces, including the Amal Movement and other political actors, while honoring the sacrifices of martyrs and the endurance of the Lebanese people.

“Write it in history: the Israeli enemy will not remain on a single inch of our occupied land. Our people will return to every part of it.”

He concluded with a message of resolve and reconstruction:

“As we resisted together, we will rebuild together.”

This statement clarifies a sharp divide in Lebanese politics, where the resistance continues to serve as the guardian of sovereignty, while certain political directions instead threaten it. (PW)

Russia, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held extensive talks in St. Petersburg, where Moscow openly acknowledged the resilience of the Iranian people and the failure of U.S.–Zionist aggression to break Iran.

“At the beginning of our conversation, I would like to note that last week I received a message from the Supreme Leader of Iran,” Putin said during his meeting with Araghchi, signaling direct communication at the highest level between Tehran and Moscow.

Speaking after the meeting, Araghchi said the discussions were conducted in detail, reflecting a growing convergence between Tehran and Moscow at a critical moment in West Asia’s geopolitical transformation.

Comprehensive Talks on War, Region, and Strategic Cooperation

Araghchi described the meeting as “very constructive,” noting that it lasted more than 90 minutes. He stated that the talks addressed “all issues in detail,” including the war imposed on Iran by the United States and the Zionist regime—an aggression that has failed to break Iranian resistance and instead reshaped regional dynamics.

He highlighted that both sides explored expanding cooperation, with “very good ideas” proposed to strengthen bilateral ties across multiple sectors. According to Araghchi, the current environment offers “excellent grounds for cooperation,” signaling a new phase in Iran–Russia strategic alignment.

The Iranian foreign minister also reaffirmed Tehran’s firm commitment to maintaining and expanding its strategic partnership with Moscow under evolving global conditions.

Global Recognition of Iran’s Resistance

One of the most striking aspects of the meeting, according to Araghchi, was President Putin’s acknowledgment of the Iranian people’s resistance and victory.

“Putin stated that not only Russia, but the entire world is now praising the Iranian people,” Araghchi said, pointing to their steadfastness in the face of U.S. pressure and their triumph in what he described as an “unequal and unjust war.”

This recognition underscores a growing international awareness that Washington’s campaign of coercion has failed to subdue Iran, instead exposing the limits of American power and the resilience of nations that refuse submission.

Russia Backs Iran’s Sovereignty, Sends Message to Leader

Reinforcing this stance, Putin said the Iranian people are “fighting courageously and heroically for their sovereignty,” expressing confidence that they will overcome current challenges.

He also asked Araghchi to convey a message directly to Iran’s leadership, underscoring the depth of ties between Tehran and Moscow.

“Please convey to the Supreme Leader the words of gratitude for this message and wishes of all the best, health and well-being,” Putin told Araghchi.

He further stressed that Russia would act in ways that serve Iran’s interests and those of the broader region.

“As for our part, we will do everything that meets your interests and the interests of all the peoples of the region, so that this peace can be achieved as quickly as possible,” Putin said.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov reinforced this position, warning against any return to military escalation and emphasizing that continued aggression would harm not only Iran but also regional states and the global economy.

Strategic Partnership Strengthened in New Phase

Araghchi conveyed Iran’s appreciation for Russia’s support throughout the war, while also delivering messages of goodwill from Iranian leadership to Putin.

He reiterated that Iran–Russia relations have already reached the level of a strategic partnership and will continue to advance with greater strength and coordination. (PW)

Saudi Arabia, PUREWILAYAH.COM - Saudi Arabia has announced that, following full preparations for the Hajj season, it is eagerly and fully ready to welcome Iranian pilgrims.

According to Tasnim News Agency, a representative of Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Hajj, coinciding with the arrival of a delegation from Iran’s Hajj and Pilgrimage Organization, stated that the first operational group of Iranian pilgrims is scheduled to arrive in the city of Medina tomorrow.

They will then proceed to Mecca in complete safety, tranquility, and peace of mind to perform the obligatory Hajj rituals under secure and comfortable conditions.

“We are awaiting their arrival at the Sacred House of God with utmost enthusiasm and hospitality,” the representative said.

Coordination Between Tehran and Riyadh

A representative of Iran’s Hajj and Pilgrimage Organization noted that, during contacts with Saudi Arabia’s Deputy Minister for International Affairs at the Ministry of Hajj and Umrah, Saudi officials repeatedly emphasized their readiness to welcome pilgrims from across the Islamic world—particularly from Iran—with open arms.

They added that all necessary arrangements have been made in accommodation, catering, and transportation, including land, rail, and air services.

Timeline and Scale of Iranian Pilgrimage

According to the latest announcement by Iran’s Hajj and Pilgrimage Organization, approximately 30,000 Iranian pilgrims will participate in this year’s Hajj, with departures to Saudi Arabia set to begin on April 28, 2026.

The organization confirmed that the pilgrimage operations are being carried out with the authorization and approval of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council.

Iranian pilgrims, who will stay in Saudi Arabia for more than one month, are expected to spend six nights and seven days of their journey in the city of Medina.

The Hajj and Pilgrimage Organization has not yet officially clarified whether the pilgrims will travel by land or air. (PW)

Iran, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Brigadier General Esmail Qa’ani, commander of the Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, affirmed that the strength of the Resistance Front lies in the unity of the people and the cohesion of state institutions, rejecting U.S. claims of internal divisions.

Speaking on Thursday, Qa’ani said the ongoing confrontation has demonstrated that the alignment between society and leadership remains the decisive factor in facing what he described as the American–Zionist enemy.

“The strength of the Resistance Front in the war against the American–Zionist enemy stems from the unity of the street and the cohesion of officials,” he stated.

Unified Front Rejects Claims of Division

Qa’ani stressed that narratives portraying divisions within Iran are detached from reality, reiterating that all factions stand within a unified national and revolutionary framework.

“We are all revolutionaries, and with an ironclad union between the people and the government, and full commitment to the leadership of the Leader of the Revolution, we will make the criminal aggressor regret it,” he said.

His remarks come amid repeated U.S. claims suggesting internal disagreements within Iran’s political system, which officials have consistently rejected.

Message of Cohesion Echoed Across Leadership

Qa’ani also reiterated a unifying doctrine shared by senior Iranian officials:

“One God, one people, one leader, and one path — the path to victory for Iran, dearer than life itself.”

The same message was earlier published by President Masoud Pezeshkian and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf in coordinated posts, reflecting a broader alignment across Iran’s leadership.

Qa’ani’s statement underscores a consistent message from Tehran: internal cohesion and unity between the people and governing institutions remain central to the country’s strategic posture amid ongoing regional tensions. (PW)

Lebanon, PUREWILAYAH.COM — U.S. President Donald Trump announced a three-week extension of the ceasefire between Lebanon and “Israel” following talks held at the White House.

The extension follows a 10-day ceasefire that took effect last week. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the decision came after a meeting between Lebanese and Israeli officials in the Oval Office, which he described as having gone “very well.”

The meeting was attended by Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, alongside U.S. and regional representatives.

U.S. Signals Role in Lebanon

Trump stated that the United States would work with Lebanon “to help it protect itself from Hezbollah.”

“They do have Hezbollah to think about,” he said. “We are going to be working with Lebanon to get things straightened out in that country.”

He also described the talks as a “very historic” moment and said he looks forward to hosting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun.

Vice President JD Vance described the ceasefire extension as a “major, historic moment,” saying it “wouldn’t have happened without the president’s direct engagement.”

Continued Violations Reported

The extension comes amid continued Israeli violations of the ceasefire agreement that took effect on April 17.

On Wednesday, Israeli forces carried out a strike on the town of al-Tiri in southern Lebanon, resulting in the martyrdom of three people, including Al-Akhbar journalist Amal Khalil, according to Lebanese media.

At the same time, “Israel” has sought to impose a buffer zone in southern Lebanon, referred to by its officials as the “Yellow Line.”

Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri rejected the proposal.

“There are no yellow lines, no red lines, no green lines… no line concerns us, and we cannot accept that in any form,” he said.

Resistance Responds to Violations

Hezbollah has carried out a series of retaliatory operations in response to more than 200 reported Israeli ceasefire violations, targeting military positions in southern Lebanon. (PW)

Lebanon, PUREWILAYAH.COM — Ongoing Israeli violations across southern Lebanon continue to defy international law while failing to generate sustained global outrage, according to an analysis published by Al-Manar based on interviews with legal and political experts.

Despite multiple ceasefire announcements—including those in November 2024 and April 2026—Israeli forces have continued operations along the Lebanese border, systematically targeting civilian infrastructure, residential areas, and essential services, while preventing displaced residents from returning to their homes.

Systematic Destruction Across Border Communities

According to the Al-Manar report, Israeli forces have carried out widespread destruction in frontline Lebanese villages, demolishing homes, damaging hospitals, schools, and administrative institutions, and burning green areas in what experts describe as deliberate environmental harm.

Places of worship have also been targeted, including the destruction of religious symbols such as a statue of Prophet Jesus (AS) in the town of Dibl. Civilian populations, journalists, and emergency response teams have repeatedly come under attack, raising serious concerns over systematic violations of international humanitarian law.

Experts: War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity

In an interview with Al-Manar, Dr. Kamil Habib, former Dean of the Faculty of Law and Political Science at the Lebanese University, stated that Israeli actions from Gaza to Lebanon represent a comprehensive violation of international law.

“International humanitarian law, the laws of war, and all global conventions have been violated, yet there is no real international action to deter the aggressor,” he said.

Habib classified the actions as war crimes, crimes against humanity, and acts of aggression, noting that similar patterns in Gaza could amount to genocide under international law. He added that the continued documentation of these violations may eventually influence global public opinion, which has already begun to shift in certain regions.

Violations of Geneva Conventions and Environmental Damage

Dr. Ali Matar, a researcher in international relations, told Al-Manar that the violations constitute grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, particularly the principle of distinction between civilians and combatants.

“Targeting civilians, bombing hospitals and schools, attacking ambulances, and destroying homes are all clear violations,” he said.

Matar further stressed that widespread destruction of property without military necessity, forced displacement, and prevention of civilian return are explicitly classified as war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

He also highlighted environmental violations, including the burning of forests and the use of harmful substances, as breaches of international protections governing armed conflict.

Legal Accountability Blocked by Political Power

While legal avenues exist in theory—including the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice, and universal jurisdiction—experts emphasized that political realities continue to obstruct accountability.

Matar pointed to U.S. influence and the use of veto power in international institutions as a major barrier preventing meaningful legal action against Israel.

He noted that Lebanon could pursue legal pathways, including accepting ICC jurisdiction or filing cases at the ICJ, but such efforts remain constrained by geopolitical considerations.

Forcing Global Accountability

The Al-Manar analysis stresses that Lebanon must adopt a comprehensive strategy combining legal, diplomatic, and media efforts to confront these violations.

Experts highlighted the need for systematic documentation, sustained engagement with international institutions, and transforming these violations into a global public opinion issue rather than a localized conflict.

“The real challenge is not in defining the crime, but in the international will to hold the perpetrators accountable,” Matar said. (PW)

Iran, PUREWILAYAH.COM — The Leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei, stated that the growing unity among the Iranian people has begun to fracture the enemy, highlighting the strategic impact of national cohesion amid ongoing confrontation.

In a message published by his official media outlet, the Leader pointed to what he described as an “extraordinary unity” among compatriots and its direct consequences for the opposing side.

“As a result of the remarkable unity created among our compatriots, fractures have emerged within the enemy. By offering practical gratitude for this blessing, cohesion will become even stronger and more solid, and the enemies will grow more humiliated and diminished.”

He also warned of intensified psychological and media operations aimed at undermining this unity:

“The enemy’s media operations, targeting the minds and psychology of the people, seek to damage unity and national security. We must not allow this malicious objective to be realized through negligence.”

Unity as a Strategic Factor

The remarks frame unity as an active force shaping the confrontation—one that is already producing visible cracks within adversarial ranks.

This messaging aligns with earlier statements by Iran’s top leadership, who in a coordinated response rejected claims by U.S. President Donald Trump of internal division, declaring that labels such as “hardliners” and “moderates” have no place in Iran’s political reality.

Officials instead emphasized a unified national identity, asserting that the country stands as one under the leadership of the Islamic Republic.

Meanwhile, Public Support Continues Nightly

Meanwhile, citizens in multiple cities have continued gathering at night, chanting slogans of unity and expressing support for state officials.

These scenes stand in contrast to external claims of internal rifts, reinforcing the narrative of cohesion between the people and the state.Meanwhile, Public Support Continues Nightly.

Separately, Tasnim reported that the “Janfada” (Devotion) campaign—launched earlier during the war to organize volunteer forces—has surpassed 30 million participants.

Officials describe the initiative as a sustained mobilization effort, reflecting long-term public readiness rather than a sudden development. (PW)